From listening to Essena O’Neil’s video response to her social
media “career” and why she really quit social media all together I can definitely
relate her thoughts and experiences too Van Djick’s theory about neoliberal
economic principles. As Van Djick describes the culture of connectivity she
states: “culture of connectivity”: is a culture where the organization
of social exchange is staked on neoliberal economic principles. Connectivity
derives from a continuous pressure—both from peers and technologies—to expand
through competition and gain power through strategic alliances. Platform
tactics such as the popularity principle and ranking mechanisms . . . are
firmly rooted in a ideology of that values, hierarchy, competition and a winner
take all mind set” (page 21).
The part of this quotation that really sticks out to me in terms
of Essena O’Neil’s thoughts is “Connectivity derives from a continuous
pressure—both from peers and technologies—to expand through competition and
gain power through strategic alliances.” Essena felt extreme amounts of
pressure from the internet, followers on social media and other people similar to
her, constantly. This pressure as she explains it never seemed to stop which in
turn would be exhausting for anyone. With this being said, Essena explains the pressure
she received from both peers in this industry as well as the technology of
social media itself therefore consuming her whole life as she lost herself in
this fake world. This is a sort of pressure that I believe everyone in this day
and age can feel to some degree. Living in this digital world we are constantly
forced to compare ourselves to others and struggle to cope with the pressures
society puts on us as social media users thus making Essena’s realization easy
to relate to. With knowing more about Essena and her struggles we cannot assume
that everyone with a high amount of likes on their Instagram pictures are
entirely happy, and we cannot hold these people to a higher standards because
no one knows what they are going through but that sole person.
Van Djick states “to expand through competition and gain power
through strategic alliances. Platform tactics such as the popularity principle
and ranking mechanisms . . . are firmly rooted in a ideology of that
values, hierarchy, competition and a winner take all mind set”
Platforms such as Instagram and Youtube are just a select few that allow Essena along with many other people feel this competition with
other “friends” or “followers” and are beginning to believe that likes or views
is the equivalent to power or true happiness for that matter. Social media can
be consuming if you give it the power to do so, if this happens we begin to
rank ourselves in a social hierarchy in terms of followers and likes and hold
ourselves to a certain standard that isn’t even real. Our values change as this
digital world consumes us and this is something we must be aware of constantly.
This is the whole point Essena is trying to make in her video response to her
career. We cannot let these miniscule aspects of the internet consume what is
really real.
Hi Sara! Great post!
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed your discussion of our values changing as we become more consumed in digital technologies and social media platforms. I also agree that Essena O'Neill is characteristic of Van Dijck's "neoliberal economic principles" and that value cannot be distinguished through likes and followers.
Hi Sarah,
ReplyDeleteI really liked your post on Essena O'Neill. I really enjoyed how you discussed O'Neill's own personal struggles and how a strong social media presences does not equate to happiness. I think you did a great job relating this back to Van Djick’s theory of neoliberal economic principles.
Do you ever find yourself under the same pressure that Essena O'Neill describes in her video explaining why she is leaving social media?
Overall, great post!
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete